The Ten-Year Window
The IRA qualifies for the ten-year rule treatment if the following statements are true:
- You are the non-spousal or non-eligible designated beneficiary.
- The original owner hadn’t reached the Required Minimum Distribution age by the time of passing.
- The original owner passed away on or after January 1st, 2020.
Upon inheriting an IRA or 401(K) subject to the ten-year rule, you have ten years to remove all assets and funds from it – specifically by December 31st of the tenth year of the original owner’s passing.
Scenario 1: Take a Lump Sum Withdrawal
Why You Would Do It:
You might opt for a lump sum if you need immediate liquidity for significant expenses, like buying a home, paying for college, an investment opportunity, or having emergency savings. You also don’t want to risk the market falling and reducing the value of the IRA or feel taxes will go up in the future.
Pros:
- Immediate access to funds for timely large-scale investments or expenses.
Cons:
- Eliminates the possibility for continued tax-deferred growth within the Inherited IRA.
- May lead to a considerable tax bill, reducing the overall inheritance.
Scenario 2: Evenly Spread Out Until Year 10
Why You Would Do It:
This approach could be beneficial if you’re looking to manage annual taxable income effectively and stay within a lower tax bracket while taking advantage of the potential growth of the investments in the IRA.
Pros:
- Tax efficiency by spreading the taxable distributions over several years.
- Keeps the IRA’s funds growing on a tax-deferred basis, potentially increasing the overall benefit.
- Provides a regular income stream, which can be helpful for budgeting and financial planning.
Cons:
- Requires disciplined planning and regular review of distribution strategies to optimize for changing tax laws and personal circumstances.
- Could result in paying more taxes over time if tax rates increase.
Scenario 3: Strategic Withdrawals Over Ten Years
Why You Would Do It:
You may choose to withdraw significant sums at strategic intervals if you have fluctuating income or anticipate specific periods when additional funds will be needed. This approach allows for flexibility in managing cash flow while considering the tax implications of each withdrawal.
Pros:
- Aligns IRA distributions with your financial needs at different stages, allowing for better cash flow management.
- Offers tax planning opportunities by taking larger withdrawals during years when you expect to be in a lower tax bracket.
- Retains the IRA’s growth potential by only withdrawing what is needed – when it’s needed.
Cons:
- Requires sophisticated planning and a keen understanding of your tax situation year by year.
- Could lead to higher taxes in years when other income is also high or if tax rates increase across the board.
Scenario 4: Withdraw All Funds Right Before Deadline
Why You Would Do It:
You might wait until just before the deadline if you believe your tax situation will be more favorable in the future or if you want to maximize the growth potential of the investments within the IRA for as long as possible.
Pros:
- Maximizes the period of tax-deferred growth within the IRA.
- May coincide with a time when you fall into a lower tax bracket, such as retirement, reducing the tax impact.
Cons:
- Risky if tax rates rise significantly or if your income level changes unexpectedly, leading to a more considerable tax burden.
- Puts pressure on making a financial decision in a short time frame, which could lead to rushed judgments.
- If the market is down when you withdraw, you could end up with a lower total sum than if you had taken smaller distributions over time.